New Frontiers in Public Policy
We develop innovative, practical, apolitical and fully costed solutions to the great policy questions of the day.
The Korsin Plan

Rebuilding Social Security for Sustainable Solvency, Financial Stability and Tax Equity

One flat rate of 5.95% on seventeen revenue bases, replacing the payroll tax. Current-law benefits are unchanged. The methodology, every revenue base and the full workings are published below.

Modeled against the 2026 OASDI Trustees Report, intermediate assumptions · all figures real 2026 dollars · model v91

75-year actuarial balance, percent of taxable payroll
0
Current law
−4.42%
This proposal
+0.74%

An improvement of 5.16% — after funding an income floor for 26.0 million seniors. Medicare is entirely outside the plan: no payment flows to it or from it. Reserves — the trust fund’s bonds plus 75% of the investment fund — never fall below one year of benefits across the projection.

The mechanism

One rate. No brackets, no deductions, no carve-outs.

The payroll tax reaches wages and stops. It is capped, it falls only on labor, and it collects nothing from capital, inheritance, or business cash flow. When a worker is replaced by automation, Social Security loses their entire contribution with them but NOT the obligation to pay benefits.

This proposal replaces that single collection point with a 5.95% levy on seventeen revenue streams, each taxed once and only once, at point of disbursement. Every wage earner below $192,252 pays less than they do today. The employer's per-head tax disappears entirely, so hiring is no longer taxed.

Revenue bases, 2026 · $ billions
SourceBaseRevenue
1 Personal income — uncapped13,529805
2 Capital income — incl. retirement accounts4,612274
3 Business cash flow — after foreign dividends9,860587
4 Inheritances — at source, gross, incl. charitable transfers2,662158
5 Employer benefits — excluding health69842
6 Net rent — net of costs and allowance27516
7 Non-profits — gross operating surplus (BEA)27516
8 Foreign holders of US-source income1,08064
9 US persons working abroad — net of local tax1107
10 Government enterprises — operating surplus1247
11 Nonresident-alien student wages (F-1/J-1)151
12 Residential property disposal gains17811
13 Insurance and annuity inside buildup1247
14 Section 1031 rollover gains543
15 Lottery prizes and gambling winnings1378
16 Irrevocable trust retained gains664
17 Royalties to individuals533
Total33,8522,014

Against $1,368bn from today's 12.4% payroll tax — an increase of $646bn a year.

Where the money goes

A strict waterfall

Nothing is discretionary. Each claim is satisfied in full before the next one begins, and the order is written directly into the model. Medicare sits entirely outside this waterfall — it keeps its own benefit taxation tier and receives nothing from this surplus.

  1. Benefits as defined by current lawThe formula, bend points, indexing and insured-status rules are untouched.
  2. Senior Income SupplementEvery citizen aged 65 and over is lifted to 200% of the federal poverty guideline, flat at every age — $31,920 a person, 26.0 million people, $390bn in year one and $289bn a year averaged over 75 years, met in full in all 75 years. The floor is flat per person: it does not depend on who you live with, so there is nothing to determine and nothing to misstate
  3. Federal Debt Retirement and Social Security Equity Trust FundSurplus after benefits is split 45/55 between Federal Debt Retirement and investment in a Social Security Equity Trust Fund. $6.6tn of publicly-held debt retired by 2100; a fund of $16.6tn, held inside a 10% per-issuer ceiling. The fund receives $111bn a year on average, in real 2026 dollars.
  4. A cost nobody counts4.3 million Americans are currently sending money to an elderly parent — at least $40bn a year in after-tax cash transfers, and that is only what they can afford. Senior Income Supplement relieves them of the necessity. It does not reduce the burden; it removes the reason for it.
  5. The reserveThe trust fund keeps its $2.1tn of Treasury bonds. They earn interest, pay any shortfall first, and are retired only as the Social Security Equity Trust Fund grows large enough to replace them — from 2033 to 2086 — so reserves never fall below one year of benefits. The fund is modeled at a 7.25% real return and reaches $16.6tn by 2100. Both rank below the Senior Income Supplement, so a bad year draws down the reserve and never the Supplement.
Who actually pays

Most employers are net winners

Every employer in the country stops remitting the 6.2% employer payroll contribution. Only some of them pick up a levy on a base of their own. That asymmetry, not the headline rate, decides who gains and who pays.

The rule is one ratio. A payer remits more only if its levied base exceeds 1.042 times its taxable wage payroll — 6.2% divided by 5.95%. The denominator is taxable payroll rather than the full wage bill, because the employer contribution stops at the $184,500 cap while the levy does not.

+$141bnCorporate and private business, GSEs included — remits more
−$58.1bnState and local government — ratio 0.07, ~20mn employees
−$43.3bnNon-profit sector — ratio 0.27, endowments untouched

The state and local figure is the largest and the least discussed: schools, police, fire and transit employers pay the contribution today and would pay essentially nothing under the levy, because government has no cash flow, no operating surplus and no rent. The non-profit result is narrower than it looks and narrower in the sector’s favor — net investment income was removed from the non-profit base at audit, because dividends are already levied at the paying company and interest at the recipient, so endowments are untouched and a university is exposed only on its operating surplus. The self-employed are a separate and larger case again: roughly 16 million people remit the whole 12.40% themselves today.

Sector shares behind these figures are no longer estimates: at v70 the state and local, non-profit and federal wage bills were replaced with BEA wage and salary accruals, and at v74 the state and local figure was further corrected for the roughly 5 million state and local employees who are not covered by Social Security at all and on whom no employer contribution is paid today. An earlier version of the model netted the entire economy-wide employer contribution against the corporate levy alone, which credited corporations with the tax that non-profits and governments actually remit; corrected, corporate remittance rises rather than falls. The aggregate was never affected.

Collateral Benefits

Net beneficiaries

Collateral benefits by sector · $ billions a year
SectorNet Cost (BN)
Military — DoD & DHS, uniformed and civilian$(12.24)
Rest of federal government and agencies$(8.51)
Federal enterprises — USPS, TVA$(1.68)
State & local government; K-12; public universities$(58.08)
Increased Sales tax, reduced local welfare spending$(8.90)
Non-profit sector$(43.28)
Households employment social security (from BLS)$(1.70)
Private Households Parental Income Support$(40.00)
Total$(174.39)
Under stress

It survives a 2008-scale collapse

The 75-year result is scored on the Trustees’ intermediate assumptions, which is reasonable for this model. The model also has a shock absorber: if equities drop 45% and revenue drops 5% for three years, starting in 2035 while the fund is still small, coverage is maintained.

Not one year of the Senior Income Supplement is lost. The Supplement is still met 75 of 75 years and the balance is unchanged at +0.74%; the shortfall is paid from the trust fund’s bonds, and reserves dip to 0.88 years of benefits before recovering. The fund ends 2100 at $14.6tn instead of $16.6tn, and debt retirement falls to $5.7tn from $6.6tn. A harsher shock — equities down 60%, revenue down 10% for five years — is also met in full, with the fund ending at $13.5tn and reserves dipping to 0.52 years. The bound is stated so the claim is not open-ended: a revenue fall above about 15% sustained for five years would exceed the surplus and reach benefits, which the stress test does not model. Earlier versions applied the stress to the surplus rather than to revenue, about a sixth of the base; the figures here are on revenue, as described.

What carries the early decades is not the fund, which is small before 2060. It is the trust fund’s bonds, held as the reserve, and the fact that seventeen bases do not fall together: inheritance does not drop in a recession, net rent barely moves, and foreign holders of US-source income follow a different cycle. Under current law Social Security rides one highly cyclical stream.

Results

Scored over 75 years

+0.74%Actuarial balance after all commitments
NeverYear reserves are depleted
75 / 75Years the Senior Income Supplement is met in full
5.95%One flat levy rate, in statute and in fact, for all 75 years
6.5mnPeople lifted out of poverty (26.0mn lifted to the floor)
$6.6tnPublicly-held debt retired by 2100

The balance before the Senior Income Supplement is charged is +2.56%. That figure is not quoted on its own anywhere in these materials, because it is gross of a commitment the proposal itself makes.

Documents

Everything, including the workings

Every printed figure traces to a named cell in the model, and the model’s Reconciliation tab ties each one back to its source. The documents below set out the method, the assumptions and all seventeen revenue sources in full.